Conventional wisdom says all horses develop stamina with maturity. Give a 2-year-old time to strengthen, and they’ll handle longer distances at three and four.
Analysis of 500+ horses proves this is only half true. Understanding which pattern a horse follows reveals which will improve at different distances—before form proves it and prices move.
There are two maturation patterns in racehorse development, divided around 7 furlongs. Sprint horses develop speed. Stamina horses develop distance. The 7-furlong mark represents the approximate threshold—some horses divide at 6.5f, others at 7.5f—but the pattern centres around this distance.
The market prices horses as if they all develop the same way. They don’t. That’s where the value sits.
The Data
From 2-year-old to 3-year-old, horses with predicted optimal distances below 7 furlongs gain an average of 0.3 furlongs. From 5.8f to 6.1f.
Horses with predicted optimal distances above 7 furlongs gain an average of 2.4 furlongs, progressing from 8.3f at age two to 10.7f at age three.
That’s eight times more distance development for stamina horses than sprint horses. 92% of sprint horses remained sprinters. Of the 8% who didn’t, a number were likely stayers forced to race short as 2-year-olds due to race availability or trainer strategy. Extremely Zain is a perfect example—debuted over 6f at Newcastle but showed stride signatures indicating 10f+ potential, exactly as predicted in Stride Watch.
For context: In this analysis, ‘sprint horses’ refers to horses with predicted optimal distances below 7 furlongs—those built primarily for speed. ‘Stamina horses’ refers to horses with predicted optimals above 7 furlongs—those built for sustained aerobic effort. This differs from traditional UK racing terminology where sprints are 5-6f, middle-distance is 10-12f, and stayers are 13f+. The 7-furlong breakpoint identifies the physiological divide between speed-dominant and stamina-dominant horses.
Horses whose predicted 3-year-old optimal is below 7 furlongs are already close to their mature distance as 2-year-olds. Maturation produces minimal distance gain—instead, development goes into speed and power. Horses whose predicted 3-year-old optimal is above 7 furlongs still have significant distance development ahead. The aerobic capacity that defines them hasn’t been fully tested yet.
Why Racehorse Development Splits at 7 Furlongs
Racing below 7 furlongs relies primarily on anaerobic energy systems—explosive power and speed. Racing above 7 furlongs engages aerobic systems—sustained stamina and oxygen delivery.
This physiological difference is well established in equine exercise physiology. Different race distances place fundamentally different demands on the horse’s energy systems.
Sprint horses are built for anaerobic racing. They can’t slow their stride frequency much, even when cruising. This limits oxygen exchange but maximises speed. Maturity makes them faster sprinters, not stayers.
Stamina horses are built for aerobic racing. They can slow their stride significantly while cruising, maximising oxygen intake. This superior aerobic capacity only emerges with maturity, training, and race distance. A horse suited to 8 furlongs at two develops into 10-12 furlongs by four.
The 7-furlong threshold is where aerobic capacity becomes essential. Below it, speed dominates. Above it, stamina decides outcomes.
What the Market Gets Wrong
The racing world often assumes racehorse development follows a single pattern—all horses develop stamina with maturity.
Trainers stretch 2-year-old sprinters to 7 furlongs, expecting progress. The market prices horses for Classic distances based on pedigree and form, assuming development follows one pattern.
But there are two patterns. Sprint horses aren’t underdeveloped—they’re already near optimal for distance. Stamina horses aren’t being held back—they haven’t yet raced at distances that suit their aerobic profile. They’re still developing into their optimal range.
This is why conventional wisdom—”all horses want further with age”—is incomplete. Only stamina horses want significantly more distance. Speed horses stay at sprint distances and get faster with maturity.
Every year, ante-post Derby and Oaks markets are filled with high-performing 2-year-olds who lack the stamina signature to progress into middle-distance horses. The market assumes development that won’t happen. By the time form proves it and the market catches on, the value has evaporated.
Sprint horses get overbet when stepped up in trip. The market assumes distance development that won’t come. Stamina horses get undervalued early in their careers when racing below their eventual optimal. The market hasn’t priced in the development that’s coming.
Value exists where the market applies one rule to two populations.
Theory and analysing historical data is one thing, but what about testing forward-looking predictions—the whole purpose of stride analysis?
Let’s project forward to the 2026 Classics.
Testing the Theory: The 2025 Dewhurst Stakes
The Dewhurst Stakes is run at 7 furlongs—at the breakpoint where sprint horses and stamina horses divide. It’s the most prestigious 2-year-old race over this distance, and historically it’s launched both Guineas winners, Derby horses, and sprint champions. City Of Troy won the 2023 Dewhurst before winning the 2024 Epsom Derby. U S Navy Flag won the 2017 Dewhurst, failed to win when stepped up to a mile, then dropped back to 6f and won the 2018 July Cup at Newmarket.
Stride analysis of the 2025 field reveals which horses will develop stamina and which won’t. Here are the predictions for their 3-year-old campaigns:
Table: 2025 Dewhurst Stakes – Stride Analysis
| Horse | Finish | Stride Profile | Predicted 3yo Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Avenue | 7th | Sprint | 6.6f |
| Saba Desert | 9th | Sprint | 7.3f |
| Gewan | 1st | Sprint | 7.4f |
| Oxagon | 5th | Sprint | 7.5f |
| Distant Storm | 3rd | Transition Zone | 8.1f |
| Italy | 8th | Transition Zone | 8.2f |
| Zavateri | 4th | Transition Zone | 8.3f |
| Gstaad | 2nd | Stamina | 8.2f |
| Alparsian | 6th | Stamina | 8.6f |
Sprint Signatures – Develop Speed:
Gewan (Winner 25/1) → Predicted 3yo optimal: 7.4f
The Dewhurst winner has a sprint signature with a predicted optimal of 7.4f from the truly-run Dewhurst. He’s currently 12/1 joint 2nd favourite for the 2000 Guineas.
Will he stay the mile? It’s borderline on predicted optimal, but his sprint signature suggests he’s racing at or near his optimal as a 2-year-old and unlikely to develop stamina. His Gimcrack win at York produced a more generous prediction (8.3f), but that race came with a pace confidence warning—a couple of slow early furlongs at York temper reliability. The truly-run Dewhurst offers stronger evidence.
Prediction: May prove best short of a mile as a 3-year-old.
Pacific Avenue (7th) → Predicted 3yo optimal: 6.6f
Extreme sprint signature—the most pronounced in the field. Ran 7th because 7f was already too far. Prediction: Drop to 5-6f as a 3-year-old. Natural sprinter being campaigned beyond his distance.
Oxagon (5th) → Predicted 3yo optimal: 7.5f
Sprint signature suggesting he’s not likely to develop stamina. Borderline—could stretch out to a mile on raw ability, but his natural stride biomechanics favour speed over stamina. Other runs point at 7-8f range. Prediction: 7f may prove optimal.
Stamina Signatures – Will Develop Distance:
Gstaad (2nd, 7/4 favourite) → Predicted 3yo optimal: 8.2f
Stamina signature. Likely to develop stamina with maturity. A mile well within range and could stretch out to 10f as a maximum based on 2-year-old evidence.
Runner-up at 7f but will come into his own over further. If he meets Gewan again over a mile or beyond, expect the form to reverse—the longer the trip, the more it favours Gstaad’s aerobic profile. Prediction: 8-10f optimal by age three.
Alparsian (6th) → Predicted 3yo optimal: 8.6f
Strongest stamina signature in the race. Raced below his best distance. Prediction: Better at 8-10f as he matures.
Transition Zone – Limited Stamina Development:
Distant Storm (3rd), Zavateri (4th), Italy (8th) → Predicted 3yo optimal: 8.1-8.3f
Neither sprint nor stamina signatures—these are pure milers. All three sit just above the 7f threshold with predicted optimals clustered around 8f. They’ll stay a mile but don’t show the aerobic capacity for significant stamina development beyond that.
Prediction: Proper milers rather than middle-distance horses.
The pattern is clear. The Dewhurst winner (Gewan) is 12/1 joint 2nd favourite for the Guineas despite stride analysis indicating a sprint signature—a borderline case where a mile may prove beyond his best distance. The runner-up (Gstaad) was favourite on the day, but his stamina signature suggests he’s going to prove best at 8-10f—further than the 7f Dewhurst trip. If they meet over a mile or beyond, expect Gstaad to reverse the form.
Check back as the season progresses in 2026 to see how the Dewhurst predictions unfold.
Which Horses Will Develop Stamina?
Stride biomechanics reveal which side of the breakpoint a horse falls on before form proves it. Sprint signatures indicate horses built for speed—high stride frequency, anaerobic reliance. Stamina signatures indicate horses built for distance—low stride frequency, aerobic capacity.
A 2-year-old racing at 6 furlongs with a sprint profile won’t want extended trips at three. They’ll get faster at sprint distances. A 2-year-old racing at 8 furlongs with a stamina profile will want 10-12 furlongs by four. They’re still developing distance capacity.
The market prices them as if they’ll develop the same way. They won’t.
Not all horses develop stamina. Stride analysis reveals which side of the breakpoint a horse falls on before the market figures it out.
See Stride Analysis in Action
This methodology identifies Classic contenders with the biomechanics to get the trip—and those who don’t. See the predictions:
→ Derby 2026 Predictions – Which 3-year-olds have the stamina signature for 12 furlongs
→ Oaks 2026 Predictions – Fillies who will and won’t stay the Classic trip
→ Stride Watch – Regular analysis identifying horses who will improve for a distance change
For more on the methodology behind these predictions, see Understanding Stride Biomechanics.
Get Predictions Before The Market Moves
Stride analysis identifies value before form proves it and prices move. By the time the market catches on, the edge is gone.
Join the email list to get predictions and analysis delivered when they matter—not after the race is run.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Just stride analysis and predictions.